Nick Oettinger, managing director of The Furniture Recycling Group discusses whether the target of zero avoidable waste to landfill by 2050 is Achievable or a complete pipe dream?
The earth’s resources are becoming scarce and extremely costly to access. It’s time for legislation to be put in place to stop the linear products from going to landfill and to create a circular economy.
In the UK, the recent announcement of the government’s 25-year environment plan is focused on eliminating all avoidable plastic waste by the end of 2042, encouraging supermarkets to introduce plastic-free aisles, extending the 5p charge for plastic carrier bags to all retailers, exploring charges on single-use items, and injecting new funding into plastic innovation.
However, this is only a small step towards what is a much larger, long-term issue. The government need to go much further, targeting additional areas of waste and tackling the problem at the source to ensure manufacturers consider recycling at design stages.
The government also recently released details of its Clean Growth Strategy, and in it they announced zero avoidable waste to landfill by 2050. It said it wanted to be “eliminating all waste where it is technologically, environmentally and economically practicable to do so” and said it would be “working to support innovation in new materials, products and processes that extend the range of materials covered by this categorisation.”
While this is a noble aim, it is dependent upon the definition of ‘avoidable waste’. All waste can be recycled, however, there is a cost associated with the recycling of certain types of waste. If avoidable waste really means commercially non-viable waste, then we will be no further forward than we are today.
The government also set out a new Resources and Waste strategy which “seeks to maximise resource productivity, reduce waste in our energy and resource systems, promote well-functioning markets for secondary materials and incentivise producers to design better products”.
It is focusing on maximising resource productivity through more efficient manufacturing processes, maximising the value we get from resources through designing products more smartly in order to increase longevity and enable recyclability, and managing materials at their end of life. This means manufacturers, retailers and other businesses will soon be called upon to focus on prioritising end-of-life recycling in the very early stages of new product development.
The Case for EPR
If the government is defining avoidable waste as waste that cannot physically be recycled at any cost, then the government must implement producer responsibility schemes in all areas of waste. This will not only help to pay for the responsible recycling of the goods at the end of their useful life, but also hopefully encourage producers to be manufacturing more efficient products. It seems like there’s a great likelihood of something like this to be put in place, with the government stating that they are looking to explore how they can better incentivise producers to manage resources more efficiently.
Producer responsibility forces designers, manufacturers and retailers into considering what will happen to goods at the end of their useful life and designing products that take this into account, so that the end of a product’s life is merely the start of a new one. By placing more onus on manufacturers and retailers to deliver this, it means more accountability and no doubt, more action.
Legally enforceable producer responsibility schemes for all areas of waste need to be legislated for. This recycling levy on all products that are not biodegradable would pay for the responsible recycling of the goods at the end of their useful life. It would also make manufacturers far more likely to consider recycling when they develop new products.
Having producer responsibility schemes in place will be a huge step towards the circular economy and in time would help ensure that products thrown away are able to be reused or recycled in a cost-effective manner, which does not include landfill or energy from waste as an option.
Although the schemes will impact the initial cost of goods by driving them upwards, from a waste strategy perspective, making items more expensive will undoubtedly see consumers less likely to throw away or update items as often as they do now, which can only be a positive result.
Lack of Awareness
One of the main reasons why businesses, manufacturers and retailers aren’t so focused on recycling waste could lie in a lack of awareness, likewise for consumers. The majority of people simply don’t know, or realise, how much of the items and products they buy can be recycled.
One solution could be to implement something similar to food nutrition labels, where items are labelled with a breakdown of what’s in the product, such as the amount of fat, protein and carbohydrates. A recyclability sticker like this on items would require manufacturers to consider recycling when they are developing products and would go some way to enable consumers to make an informed choice about the products they buy.
A trade ban being implemented preventing businesses from sending items to landfill will be a big step in the right direction towards zero avoidable waste by 2050.
However, this would cause big changes in the recycling industry. If a Landfill Tax was increased, making it more expensive to send waste to landfill, there would be a push to recycle those items commercially viable to be recycled and items that are not currently viable for recycling, but are likely to become so.
The knock-on effect would be a sudden increase in demand for recycling. Instead, there needs to be a phased transition with sound infrastructure put in place to ensure that recycling outlets are robust enough to cope with this increased intake of recycling.
In the UK for example, the Landfill Tax is sure to be a big influence in whether zero avoidable waste will be landfilled by 2050, hopefully deterring people from using landfill so freely.
However, the greatest way zero avoidable waste can be achieved is through businesses taking responsibility and working together towards the desperately needed circular economy.
It’s difficult to see whether zero avoidable waste by 2050 is really achievable, as there is still a very long way to go, but the only way the target can be achieved is if we’re all seeking to achieve it. If everyone, from consumers to businesses, strives to reach the target, we will surely be close to recycling as much waste as possible.
However, for the UK, the government’s 25-year plan is overall disappointing. It has missed a major opportunity to take tangible steps towards a circular economy that would, in time, help to ensure that products thrown away can be reused or recycled in a cost-effective manner, which does not include landfill or energy from waste as an option. More still needs to be done.