Interface Between Chemical, Product & Waste Highlighted : CEWEP welcomes EU Communication’s Focus on Decontamination of Materials
The Confederation of European Waste-to-Energy Plants (CEWEP) has welcomed the Commission’s Communication on the interface between chemical, product and waste legislation.
According to CEWEP, while the Plastics Strategy, which represents the Commission’s vision for plastics in a Circular Economy was prominently noticed by the media and stakeholders, there was little or no attention paid to the Commission’s Communication on the interface between chemical, product and waste legislation (Interface Communication) and the accompanying staff document.
However, the organisation said that it is in fact the latter that gives a comprehensive analysis of the main issues relating to the use of secondary materials this way taking an important step towards a sustainable circular economy.
According to the Interface Communication, the two main objectives of the circular economy, recycling as much as possible and reducing the presence of substances of concern can be in opposition.
While the Plastic Strategy with its goals for 2030 continues to set quantitative goals, the Interface Communication clearly asks for a qualitative, fit-for-purpose approach.
A study published by the European Commission in preparation for the Interface Communication states that: “Collection and recycling targets focus on increasing the amounts of recycled materials, not on their quality regarding the absence of toxic substances. <…> legislation does not incentivise activities to decontaminate waste/recycled materials.”
To overcome these limitations, CEWEP said that more than a vision of a secondary raw material market full of high-quality recyclates is necessary. There is a need for a clear strategy on how to deal with the products which are now in use and will become waste in the future. Their properties cannot be altered by the design vision.
The confederation argued that the only sustainable way forward when it comes to waste recycling is to implement quality criteria in order to create a market demand. The parts which are not suitable for quality recycling, e.g. due to substances of concern, should be treated in a safe manner in modern Waste-to-Energy plants.
It said that this helps to achieve a clean circular economy and is by far more sustainable than landfilling this waste and noted that the EU still landfills more than 60 million tonnes of municipal waste yearly and 31% of all plastic waste generated in the EU is landfilled.
According to CEWEP Landfilling these waste streams that can be used for material and energy recovery is a fundamental waste of resources. Diverting waste from landfills also helps to avoid littering, microplastics and leaching of harmful substances into the environment.
CEWEP concluded by saying that it firmly supports a sustainable Waste Hierarchy. Waste prevention first, including the reduction of substances of concern. Quality recycling of the waste that cannot be prevented or reused, and Waste-to-Energy for waste that is not suitable for sustainable recycling. Not wasting resources in landfill.
Read More
CEWEP: Commission’s Waste to Energy Communication a ‘Mouse’
CEWEP has labelled the Waste-to-Energy Communication from the EU Commission to the EU Parliament on the Role of Waste-to-Energy in the Circular Economy as a mountain which ‘brought forth a mouse’.
CEWEP: Waste to Energy Cuts GHG Emissions Compared to Landfill
CEWEP has hit back at a recent report which claimed that there is not much difference between landfill and incineration from a climate perspective, and said that it is a dangerous message ahead of COP21.
Benefits of Waste to Energy Outlined in CEWEP Open Letter
CEWEP has written an open letter to the European Commission ahead of its decision regarding the Circular Economy Package to make the case for recovering energy from waste.
